Tesla has taken a former employee to court for allegedly hacking company data and handing it over to third parties.
According to court documents filed with the US District Court (District of Nevada) this week, Martin Tripp was hired as a process technician at Tesla’s Nevada Gigafactory in October 2017.
He had access to some of Tesla’s highly sensitive information, including the manufacturing process for battery module manufacturing. He was also required not to disclose or use Tesla’s information beyond his role with tesla.
However, he believed his role as process technician was not enough of a senior role for him. Managers also reported poor job performance and disruption and Tripp was reassigned to another role on May 17, 2018.
Tesla alleges that Tripp took wilful and reckless actions against the company by stealing confidential and trade secret information, and sharing that information with third parties. He also allegedly made false statements to harm the company.
Between June 14-15 Tesla investigators interviewed Tripp. While initially denying misconduct, he then admitted to writing software that hacked Tesla.
“Tesla has only begun to understand the full scope of Tripp’s illegal activity, but he has thus far admitted to writing software that hacked Tesla’s manufacturing operating system (“MOS”) and to transferring several gigabytes of Tesla data to outside entities. This includes dozens of confidential photographs and a video of Tesla’s manufacturing systems,” the court documents say.
Tripp also wrote code that would export data from Tesla’s network to third parties by loading the ‘hacking software’ onto other employees’ computers. The software would continue to export, even after he left the company and falsely implicating the other computer users.
According to the documents, Tripp is accused of:
He also tried to recruit other people inside the Gigafactory in order to distribute the confidential information.
Tesla also alleges that Tripp made false statements to the media about the stolen information.
“For example, Tripp claimed that punctured battery cells had been used in certain Model 3 vehicles even though no punctured cells were ever used in vehicles, batteries or otherwise. Tripp also vastly exaggerated the true amount and value of “scrap” material that Tesla generated during the manufacturing process, and falsely claimed that Tesla was delayed in bringing new manufacturing equipment online,” the court documents state.
Tesla says it has already suffered ‘significant and continuing damages’ as a result of Tripp’s misconduct.
“Tesla derives independent economic value from the fact that its confidential, proprietary, and trade secret information is not generally known to the public and not readily ascertainable through proper means. Tesla has taken, and continues to take, reasonable measures to keep that information secret and confidential,” the court documents state.
Tesla is seeking a jury trial with the intent of receiving injunctive relief, compensatory damages (yet to be determined), punitive and exemplary damages, prejudgment interest, legal fees and expenses, and other forms of ‘relief’.